Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1887 (UTT)

KISHORI LAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C482/116/2023 · 2025-03-27

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS C482 No.116 of 2023 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Raj Kumar Singh, Advocate for the applicant. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dohbhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Vide order dated 24.01.2023, on the request made by learned counsel for the applicant, time was granted to learned counsel for the applicant to file supplementary affidavit to bring on record the application, if any, written to S.S.P. under Section 154(3) of Cr.P.C., by the private respondents. 4. Despite lapse of more than two years, no supplementary affidavit has been filed by learned counsel for the applicant; therefore, the C482 application is dismissed for non compliance of the order dated 24.01.2023. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 27.03.2025 SK