Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18869 (ALL)

ANKITA GUPTA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/243/2025 · 2025-04-01

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:45893 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 243 of 2025 Applicant :- Ankita Gupta And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Srivastava,Neelabh Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as B.N.S.S.) has been filed with a prayer to direct the learned trial court to conclude the proceeding of Case No. 304 of 2022 (Ankita Gupta and another Vs. Sahil Chaudhary), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station Kydganj, District Prayagraj, pending before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Allahabad, expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicant no. 1 is aggrieved wife alaongwith her minor son applicant no. 2. Husband of the applicant no. 1 filed his objection and evidence as an affidavit has been adduced by the applicant no. 1 and the case is pending at the stage of cross-examination of PW- 1 and no order regarding interim maintenance has been passed so far. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. From perusal of the record, it appears that the matter is pending at the stage of cross examination of PW-1 and no order regarding interim maintenance has been passed so far. 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned trial court is directed to decide the Case No. 304 of 2022 (Ankita Gupta and another Vs. Sahil Chaudhary), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station Kydganj, District Prayagraj expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is also made clear that the Court/Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and execution authorities, advocates, parties to the case, staff are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 2.4.2025 Rmk. Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad