Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18868 (RAJ)

SMT. PINKI WIFE OF LATE SH. RAVIKANT S/O LATE SHRI BANWARI LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/8776/2022 · 2025-09-10

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:36557] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8776/2022 Smt. Pinki Wife of Late Sh. Ravikant S/o Late Shri Banwari Lal, Aged About 32 Years, Resident of Jatwan Mohalla, Radha Kund Rural, Goverdhan, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh-281502. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Director, Directorate Of Pension And Pensioners Welfare Rajasthan, Jaipur Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur-302015. 2. The Principal Accountant General (A And E) Rajasthan-2, Janpath, C Scheme, Jaipur (India)-302005. 3. The Principal Accountant General, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow. 4. Tresurer, District Treasury Office, Mathura -Uttar Pradesh. 5. District Education Officer, Jaipur- Rajasthan. 6. Block Education Officer, Govindgarh, District -Jaipur- Rajasthan. 7. Srikant S/o Late Shri Banwari Lal, R/o Jatwan Mohalla, Radha Kund Rural, Goverdhan, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh- 281502. 8. Vimal S/o Late Shri Banwari Lal, R/o Jatwan Mohalla, Radha Kund Rural, Goverdhan, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh- 281502 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.S. Raghav Mr. Aatish Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. C.P. Sharma on behalf of Mr. Devesh Kumar Bansal for respondent No.2 Mr. Deepak Kumar Sharma for respondents No.7 & 8 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 10/09/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for claiming the benefit of death gratuity and other benefits arising [2025:RJ-JP:36557] (2 of 2) [CW-8776/2022] out of death of the deceased Government servant- Shri Banwari Lal. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid benefits were not released by the respondent- Government, only on account of inter se dispute between the family members of deceased Government servant. During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner as well as other family members-respondents No.7 & 8, have also agreed that a compromise has been entered into between the private parties. 3. Learned Government counsel submits that in case, compromise has been entered into between the private parties relating to deceased Government servant, the official respondents have got no objection in releasing the benefits of death gratuity and other benefits in accordance with the terms of compromise. 4. In view of above consensus between the parties to the writ petition, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the writ petition with the direction that the petitioner along with respondents No.7 & 8 may file a joint application along with the copy of this order before respondents No.1 & 5, who shall take into consideration the compromise between the parties and pass necessary orders in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this instant order. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /53