Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18868 (MAD)

Mercedes Benz Financial Services India Private Limited v. Kannan Rajaram

Arb Appln/215/2025 · 2025-04-02

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Arb. Appln. No.215 of 2025 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18.03.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb. Appln. No215 of 2025 M/s.Mercedes – Benz Financial Services India Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Authorised Signatory .. Applicant vs. Kannan Rajaram ... Respondent For Applicant : Ms.B. Narmadha for Mr.M. Arunachalam - - - - - - The learned counsel for the applicant seeks extension of time for the Advocate Commissioner to repossess the vehicle. Accordingly, time is extended for the Advocate Commissioner to execute the Warrant of Commission by another period of two weeks from today. It is made clear that if the Advocate Commissioner fails to repossess the vehicle on or before the next hearing date, this application shall stand automatically closed, granting liberty to the applicant to file a fresh application 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb. Appln. No.215 of 2025 seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to repossess the vehicle, once the vehicle is located. Post the matter on 02.04.2025. 18.03.2025 Note : Registry is directed to issue a fresh Warrant of Commission, extending the time as stated supra. vsi2 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb. Appln. No.215 of 2025 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. vsi2 Arb. Appln. No215 of 2025 18.03.2025 3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis