Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18868 (AP)

K. Annapurna Parameswari, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/13618/2025 · 2025-06-16

Challa Gunaranjan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ' i! PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 13618 OF 2025 Between: ^ ^aganna, aged 47 years, R/o. G.K. Rachapalli Post and Village, T.Sundupalli Mandal, YSR District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Region^ Joint Director of Intermediate Education, Kadapa Region Kadapa, YSR District. ’ ^ Andh^al^radeSi^^'^^'^^^'^^ Intermediate Education, Vijayawada, ^ College, (Aided), Madhavaram, YSR ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or orders particularly the Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Special Commissioner, Intermediate Education in not appointing the petitioner and the Regional Joint Director intermediate Education in not appointing the petitioner to the post of Junior Lecturer (Telugu) Aided in pursuance to the recommendation of the 4*^ respondent dated 23.06.2021 vide Rc.No. SC/ST Backlog 2021 arbitrary, unconstitutional, violative of Go.Ms.No. 51 School Education Department dated 17.08.2021 and Go.Ms.No. 64 dated 24.09.2021 as illegal. (IE) and A Violative of Article 14,16 and 21 of Constitution of India direct the respondent to appoint the petitioner as Junior Lecturer (Telugu) Aided. and consequently lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to forthwith direct the respondents 2 the case of the petitioner for appointment nd and 3^^ to consider as Junior Lecturer (Telugu) Aided as per the Go.Ms.No. 51 School Education (IE) Department 17.08.2021 and Go.Ms.No. 64 dated 24.09.2021 dated in the interest of justice pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI CHUKKA KRANTHI KIRAN FOR SRI G. TUHIN KUMAR EDIK^^N Respondent No?.1 to 3 : GP FOR SERVICES II & GP FOR Counsel for the Respondent No.4 -. NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER ...j p- APHC010261522025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 13618/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER K. Annapurna Parameswari AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.GTUHIN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GPFOR SERVICES II 2 HCGR.J W.P.No.l3618of2025 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief/s:- “...to issue a Writ, order or orders particularly the Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Special Commissioner, Intermediate Education in not appointing the petitioner and the Regional Joint Director Intermediate appointing the petitioner to the post of Junior Lecturer (Telugu) Aided in pursuance to the recommendation of the 4th respondent dated 23.06.2021 vide Rc.No. SC/ST Backlog 2021, as Go.Ms.No. 51 School 17.08.2021 and Go.Ms.No. 64 dated 24.09.2021 and Violative of Article 14,16 and 21 of Constitution of India consequently direct the respondent to appoint the petitioner as Junior Lecturer (Telugu) Aided and pass such other order or orders....” Education in not illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violative of Education (IE) Department dated and 2. Heard Sri Chukka Kranthi Kiran, learned counsel, representing Sri G.Tuhin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Education for respondents. 3. Petitioner is stated to have appeared for selection to the post I th of Junior Lecturer (Telugu) and has been selected accordingly in 4 nd respondent-College and the said proposal has been sent to 2 respondent by proceedings dated 23.06.2021 for approval, which is pending consideration before 2^^ repsondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would suffice to direct the 2"^^ respondent to consider the same. 3. 4. Learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents would submit that as the recommendations are pending with the 2nd 3 HCGR,J W.P.No.l3618of2025 respondent, the same will be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. t. 5. In view of aforesaid submissions, with the consent of both the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage, directing the 2"^ respondent to consider the case of petitioner for appointment to the post of Junior Lecturer (Telugu) in respondent No.4-College, in pursuant to the recommendations made by 4 respondent vide proceedings in Rc.No.SC/ST Backlog/2021 dated 23.06.2021 to 2"^^ respondent, in accordance with law, within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. th As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT) REGISPRAR . OFFICER I //TRUECOPY// SE To. Region, (Aided) 6 Two "^^^'n.Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 7.' Two CCS to GP FOR E^lTcAiON^H Pradesh [OUT] [OUT] ^ tDUCATION, High Court of Andhra Pradesh 8. Three C.D. Copies Cnr (gsg) Education, Vijayawada, Madhavaram, YSR '■S- w t <1 HIGH COURT DATED:17/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.13618of2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS