Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188659 (ALL)

YASEER @ GUDDU v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (HOME DEPTT.) LKO.

BAIL/3155/2025 · 2025-11-18

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3155 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Qazi Mohd Ahmad, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 411 of 2024, under sections 3(5), 103(1), 238, 352, 85, 123 P.S. Tikaitnagar, District Barabanki. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that sister of the informant was married to the applicant. Subsequently dispute arose in between them and allegations was levelled that entire matrimonial family had killed her. It was also alleged that marks on the neck of the deceased were seen. Thus apprehension was expressed that entire matrimonial family killed her. Cause of death as per post mortem report could not be ascertained and in the viscera report poison was found. The applicant is the husband. There is nothing on record to demonstrate that the applicant, if enlarged on bail, can adversely affect the trial. 4. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the post mortem report, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 1.2.2025 and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravindra Kumar Singh, Rashmi Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Qazi Mohd.Ahmad Yaseer @ Guddu .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home Deptt.) Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Yaseer @ Guddu be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence (d) In case the applicant intends to leave the country he shall do so only with permission of trial court. (e) The applicant shall surrender his passport before the trial court. November 18, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 3155 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench