Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188651 (ALL)

MANSHARAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME SEC.LKO.

BAIL/694/2025 · 2025-11-11

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 694 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 194 of 2024, under sections 70(1), 351(3) BNS and Section 66E of IT Act, P.S. Kumarganj, District Ayodhya. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that it is argued that main accused Dilbahar was enlarged on bail vide order dated 9.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 9655 of 2025. The criminal history of the applicant is explained in rejoinder affidavit. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the nature of allegations levelled against the applicant which are not even similar to the allegations levelled against the main accused, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 2.10.2024 is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Mansharam be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Niteesh Kumar, Padma Narayan Dubey, Prashant Dubey, Rajeev Mishra, Sadhana Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mansharam .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Sec.Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 11, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 694 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench