Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18865 (GAU)

DIMPI BORAH v. SURUJ GOGOI AND 4 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/3231/2024 · 2025-03-11

Kaushik Goswami

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010201612024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3231/2024 DIMPI BORAH W/O SRI JYOTISH MAZUMDAR, RESIDENT OF NALIAPOOL, PO NALIAPOOL, PS DIBRUGARH, DIST DIBRUGARH, ASSAM 786001 PRESENTLY RESIDING AT HOUSE NO. 2, BYE LANE 6, BAMHUKUTA PATH, DULIAJAN, DIST DIBRUGARH, ASSAM 786602 VERSUS SURUJ GOGOI AND 4 ORS S/O- SUREN GOGOI, R/O.- LAKHIMI ALI, P.O. NAZIRA, DIST.- SIBSAGAR, ASSAM. 785685 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY EDUCATION (SECONDARY) DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 3:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19. 4:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS SIVSAGAR DISTRICT CIRCLE SIVSAGAR ASSAM. 5:THE PRINCIPAL-CUM- MEMBER SECRETARY DEMOW H.S. SCHOOL DEMOW P.O. AND P.S. DEMOW SIVSAGAR ASSAM- 785662 Page No.# 2/3 For the applicant : Mr. J.C. Gogoi, Advocate For the respondents : Ms. S. Kanungoe, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Ms. H. Terangpi, S.C., Secondary Education for Respondent Nos.2 to 5 – B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI 12-03-2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, C.J.) The matter comes up for consideration of IA(Civil) No.3231/2024 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 with the prayer for condonation of delay of 423 days in filing the connected writ appeal. Ms. S. Kanungoe, learned counsel puts in appearance on behalf of respondent No.1 and Ms. H. Terangpi, learned Standing Counsel, Secondary Education puts in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 5. Service is, therefore, complete. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and after going through the contents of this application, we deem it appropriate to allow the prayer for condonation of delay. Accordingly, the delay of 423 days in filing the connected writ appeal is condoned. Page No.# 3/3 The interlocutory application is disposed of. Registry is directed to register the connected writ appeal and list the same after 4 (four) weeks for admission. Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to supply extra copies of the memo of appeal to the respective counsel appearing for the respondents during the course of the day. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant