Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18865 (CHH)

TURAKA ANASUYA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2848/2025 · 2025-04-28

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:18980 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2848 of 2025 1 - Turaka Anasuya W/o Late Simhachalam Aged About 54 Years R/o Main Street Vill. Bukkuru Palakonda Mandal Distt. Srikakulam Andhra Pradesh (Widow Of Deceased Employee) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, New Raipur, Atal Nagar District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Engineer In Chief Public Works Department District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Chief Engineer (Administration) Public Works Department District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Chief Engineer Public Works Department (Bh/sa) Jagdalpur Distt. Bastar C.G. SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.04.28 23:11:11 +0530 2 5 - The Superintendent Engineer Public Works Department (Bh/sa) Jagdalpur Distt. Bastar C.G. 6 - The Executive Engineer Public Works Department (Bh/sa) Division Sukuma Distt. Sukuma (C.G.) 7 - Divisional Joint Director Treasury Account And Pension Bastar Division Jagdalpur Distt. Bastar C.G. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Vikash A. Shrivatava, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Poorva Tiwari, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 28.04.2025 1. The limited relief that the Petitioner seeks for in the present Writ Petition is for an appropriate direction to the Respondents for considering the claim of the Petitioner for grant of leave encashment in terms of the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Work-Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. 2. According to the Petitioner, he has made his claim in the light of the recent decision of this High Court rendered in W.P.(S) No.3870/2021 (Faguvaram Patel & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 30.9.2022, wherein similar claim 3 of the Petitioner therein has been allowed. The said decision also stands afÏrmed by the Division Bench in W.A. No.119/2023, decided on 20.6.2023. 3. Given the said facts, the present Writ Petition is disposed of at this juncture, directing the Respondent Authorities to immediately process the claim of all similarly placed person in the light of the aforesaid decision of this High Court on the same subject-matter, within an outer limit of 120 days from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. 4. With aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib