Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18857 (RAJ)

RAMKARAN MEENA S/O SHRI RAMCHANDRA MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/8783/2024 · 2025-05-27

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8783/2024 Ramkaran Meena S/o Shri Ramchandra Meena, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village And Post Hansmahal, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Revenue Depart- ment, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. District Collector, District Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Sub Divisional Officer, Bassi, District Jaipur. 4. The Tehsildar, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur (Raj.). 5. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Hansmahal, Tehsil Bassi, Dis- trict Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shribhan Gurjar For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 27/05/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction against the respondents to remove the encroachment made upon the charagah land of the Village-Khedlawas and Hansmahal, Patwar Halka Hansmahal, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 2. It appears that before approaching this Court, the petitioner filed a representation/application before the competent authority for passing appropriate orders thereon but the same has yet not been decided / adjudicated on merits and without waiting for the decision of the competent authority on the said (2 of 2) [CW-8783/2024] representation/application, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking above directions. 3. Since the matter is sub-judice before the competent authority, it is expected from the petitioner to approach the competent authority again for deciding the matter on merits. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the instant petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority for redressal of his grievance. 5. In case, any such representation/application is submitted by the petitioner, the competent authority is expected to decide the same expeditiously as early as possible, strictly in accordance with law after affording the due opportunity of hearing to all the affected parties after following the due process of law. 6. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/12