ROHIT PAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME, SECTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/1826/2024 · 2025-11-18
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188564 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188564 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1826 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and chargesheet has been filed against the petitioner and, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid fact.
3. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum at appropriate stage. November 18, 2025 kkv/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalji Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Karan Agarwal (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Rohit Pal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Sectt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench