Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188559 (ALL)

KOMAL SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/1613/2024 · 2025-11-18

Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1613 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has pointed out that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded, and the final report has been filed in favour of the petitioners. As such the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts. In view of the statement made, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 18, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jai Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Komal Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench