SAHIL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO.
/2045/2025 · 2025-12-09
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188550 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188550 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2045 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record. 2. This application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to direct the trial Court to allow the applicant to submit only a personal bond and two sureties in lieu of four cases, mentioned in the instant application as follows: i. Case Crime No. 923 of 2025 Under Section 303(2) 317(2) 317(4) of B.N.S., at Police Station Kotwali, District Barabanki. ii. Case Crime No. 919 of 2025 Under Section 303(2) 317(2) 317(4) of B.N.S., at Police Station Kotwali, District Barabanki. iii. Case Crime No. 883 of 2025 Under Section 303(2) 317(2) 317(4) of B.N.S., at Police Station Kotwali, District Barabanki. iv. Case Crime No. 926 of 2025 Under Section 303(2) 317(2) 317(4) of B.N.S., at Police Station Kotwali, District Barabanki. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the aforesaid four cases, however, he has been granted bail all these cases. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Diwakar Pratap Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sahil .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
4. It has been further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant belongs to a very poor family so he is unable to manage 8 persons for surety before the learned trial court. 5. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in special leave to appeal Criminal No.8914- 8915 of 2018 Hani Nishad alias Mohd. Imran alias Viccky vs. State of U.P. and Others had directed that the applicant who was an accused in 31 cases be released on bail taking one personal bond and two sureties. 6. A prayer has been made by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant be also given the benefit of judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hani Nishad (supra). 7. This application is disposed of with the direction to the learned trial court to accept one personal bond and two sureties to its satisfaction in one criminal case against the applicant and such personal bond and sureties shall hold good in the other three cases in which the applicant has been granted bail.
December 9, 2025 A.Nigam NA528 No. 2045 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench