TIDI NISHAD v. STATE OF UP THRU PRIN.SECY.SUGAR CANE DEPTT.CIVIL SECTT.andORS
WRIA/31293/2017 · 2025-11-11
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188539 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188539 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 31293 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 11, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Singh Somvanshi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Aprajita Bansal, I.P. Singh, Jaiyesh Bhoosreddy (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Tidi Nishad .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up Thru Prin.Secy.Sugar Cane Deptt.Civil Sectt.Andors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench