Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188534 (ALL)

ANKIT SHARMA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/9494/2024 · 2025-11-11

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9494 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. .. 1. Case called out. 2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition nor any request for adjournment or pass over has been made whereas learned A.G.A for the State is present. 3.This Court had passed the following order on 13.12.2025:- "1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents. 2. The present petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the FIR dated 25.09.2024 bearing FIR/Case Crime No.0537/2024 under Sections 323, 307, 498A, 504 and 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District-Ayodhya. 3. At the outset, learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that this is a case of matrimonial dispute and the petitioner No.1 proposes to go for mediation and to show his bonafide, he will produce a bank draft of Rs.1,00,00 (Rupees One Lakhs Only) in favour of the respondent No.4 i.e. Smt. Shweta Sharma, wife of Ankit Sharma (petitioner No.1) by 20.12.2024. 4. In view thereof, on the request made by learned Counsel for the petitioners, list/put up this case on 20.12.2024. 5. On the next date of listing, learned Counsel for the petitioners will bring a bank draft of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakhs Only) in favour of respondent No.4 to the bonafide of the petitioners for mediation. " 4. On the very first date also, none had appeared to press the petition, therefore, the case was adjourned. Thereafter the matter has not been pursued. 5. After passing of the aforesaid order matter has not been pursued by the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Pratap Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ankit Sharma And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) petitioners, therefore, it appears that either this petition has rendered infructuous or lost its efficacy. 6. Dismissed accordingly. November 11, 2025 Shahnaz CRLP No. 9494 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench