Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010200892023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Review.Pet./110/2023 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY GENERAL MANAGER (CLAIMS), N.F. RAILWAY, MALIGAON GUWAHATI- 781001. VERSUS M/S HINDUSTAN GOODS CARIERS PVT. LTD. 529-530 BAGHICHI ABUDUL KARIM, TELWARA, DELHI-6 CORPORATE OFFICE- KEDAR ROSD, GUWAHATI- 1, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K GOGOI, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. K P MAHESWARI, M. KALITA,MS. M SHARMA Linked Case : MFA/62/2023 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER (CLAIMS) N F RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI 781001 VERSUS MS HINDUSTAN GOODS CARRIERS PVT. LTD. 529 530 BAGICHI ABUDUL KARIM TELWARA DELHI 6 CORPORATE OFFICE KEDER ROAD GUWAHATI 1 ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. K GOGOI Advocate for : MS. M SHARMA appearing for MS HINDUSTAN GOODS CARRIERS PVT. LTD. Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 16-07-2025 Heard Shri K. Gogoi, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. M. Sarma, learned counsel for the opposite party. On the last occasion, when this matter was taken up for consideration, Ms. Sarma, the learned counsel for the opposite party, in support of her objection to the review had placed reliance upon the case of Pam Developments (P) Ltd. Vs State of West Bengal reported in (2019) 8 SCC 112. After perusal of the pronouncement made by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, this Court is of the opinion that there may not be any ground requiring review of the order in question. The review application is accordingly dismissed. The connected appeal may be listed after 2 (two) weeks. JUDGE Comparing Assistant