1 2025:CGHC:46043 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3736 of 2023 1 - Sandeep Kumar Sahu S/o Late Shri Birendra Sahu Aged About 38 Years Working As Head Constable, Police Sation Berla, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home (Police ) Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director General Of Police Police Headquarter Chhattisgarh, Sector 19, Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Superintenden Of Police Bemetara,district Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Varsha Sar, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Prabhakar Singh Chandel, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 08.09.2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- "10.1 The Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the order dated 21.03.2023 issued by respondent no. 2 and further RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to permit the petitioner to continue his services at the present place of posting. 10.2 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper be awarded in favor of the petitioner, including cost." 2. This petition has been preferred assailing the order dated 21.3.2023. It is pertinent to note that during the pendency of the present proceedings, no interim relief or order of stay has been granted by this Court in favour of the petitioner. Consequently, in the absence of any protective order and in view of the subsequent developments, the present petition has lost its efficacy and has rendered itself infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent/State does not dispute the same and has no objection to the petition being dismissed as infructuous. 4. In view of the above, and since nothing further survives for adjudication, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. 5. However, liberty is granted to the respondent State authorities to pass appropriate orders in respect of transfer of the petitioner, in case exigency arises, without being influenced by this order. 6. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat