NEERAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/12197/2025 · 2025-12-09
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188515 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188515 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12197 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Saurabh Kumar Singh, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2 and perused the record. The Vakalatmana is taken on record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.528 of 2025, under Sections 64, 352, 351(3) of BNS, Police Station Kadipur, District Sultanpur.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the victim was alone at home when the applicant committed wrong on her on 10.09.2025 and threats were also issued. The FIR was lodged on 06.10.2025. The age of the victim is 23 years.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the delay in lodging the FIR and the submission of both the counsel that the parties have arrived at a settlement and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 07.10.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Neeraj Kumar be released on bail in the abovesaid Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manmohan Singh, Ashrut Singh, Dilip Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Neeraj Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 9, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 12197 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench