Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188465 (ALL)

AKASH JAISWAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

/12090/2025 · 2025-12-09

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12090 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Uday Pratap Yadav, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 113 of 2025, under sections 69, 351(3) BNS, P.S. Shreeduttganj, District Balrampur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the informant aged about 25 years met the applicant in the year 2022 and thereafter on false pretext of marriage physical relation were formed on various occasions and now the applicant was refusing to marry her. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the age of the victim and the fact that relationship lasted for substantial period of time, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 15.10.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Akash Jaiswal be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sheo Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Udai Pratap Yadav Akash Jaiswal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 9, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 12090 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench