[2025:RJ-JP:28856] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6349/2025 1. Vishal S/o Kailashchand, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Jawda, P.s. Bijoliya, Distt. Bhilwara. (At Present In Jail At Kota). 2. Rakesh @ Raka S/o Prakash, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Ganesh Ghati, Bijoliya, P.s. Bijoliya Distt. Bhilwara. (At Present In Jail At Kota). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6968/2025 1. Vishal S/o Raju, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Aaroli Ke Pass Village Bilona Badi Police Station Bijoliya District Bhilwara (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota (Raj.) 2. Pankaj S/o Rooplal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Kesarpura Police Station Bijoliya District Bhilwara (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman for Mr. Sajid Ali Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 30/07/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0052/2025 registered at Police [2025:RJ-JP:28856] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6349/2025] Station-Kotwali, District-Kota City for the offence under Section 303(2) of BNS. 2. Since both the bail applications arise out of common FIR, therefore these cases are being decided by a single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He submits that the sole allegation against the petitioners is about the theft of Motor Cycle and as per allegation twelve Motor Cycles have been recovered from their possession and by invoking provisions related to organized crime, the Police has implicated the petitioners on forged and concocted grounds. He further submits that the petitioners are behind the Bar since 28.04.2025 and there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. [2025:RJ-JP:28856] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6349/2025] 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners- (1) Vishal S/o Kailashchand (2) Rakesh @ Raka S/o Prakash (3) Vishal S/o Raju and (4) Pankaj S/o Rooplal shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. ( PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/161-162