Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188443 (ALL)

RAJA @ VEER PRATAP MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/11087/2025 · 2025-11-18

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11087 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.605 of 2025 under sections 64(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3) BNS and section 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Padhuwa, District Lakhimpur Kheri. 3. The FIR in question was lodged through an application under section 173(4) on 19.08.2024 alleging that physical relations were formed by the applicant with the daughter of the informant for the last one year on the alleged false pretext of marriage. A similar statement was given by the victim wherein she stated that their relationship continued since long. 4. Considering the age of the victim which is around 18 years and the fact that the relationship continued over a span of one year, the applicant who is in custody since 28.09.2025 is entitled for the bail. Thus the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant Raja @ Veer Pratap Maurya be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lalla Ji Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raja @ Veer Pratap Maurya .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 18, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 11087 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench