Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188431 (ALL)

SHIVANSHU NISHAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

BAIL/4056/2025 · 2025-11-18

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4056 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.304 of 2024 under sections 191(2), 103(1), 333 BNS, U.S. Uchahar, District Raebareli. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co accused Pramod Kumar, Ramakant, Neeraj Kumar with similar allegations have been enlarged on bail vide orders dated 27.10.2025, 27.10.2025 and 10.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application Nos. 4508 of 2025, 12893 of 2025 and 462 of 2025 respectively 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances and adopting the same reasoning, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 6.1.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Shivanshu Nishad be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Singh, Jay Prakash Singh, Pooja Rayakwar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mahesh Kumar Sharma Shivanshu Nishad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 18, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 4056 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench