NIRANJAN BHAKTA @ MONU v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
I.A.(Crl.)/1024/2025 · 2025-09-16
Anjan Moni Kalita, Michael Zothankhuma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18843 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18843 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010201422025
2025:GAU- AS:12785-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1024/2025 NIRANJAN BHAKTA @ MONU S/O. HARILAL BHAKTA, R/O. TILA BASTI, DILHUSH TE, P/S. LAKHIPUR, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP BY THE PP ASSAM 2:SIMA BHAKTA W/O. UPEN BHAKTA R/O. TILA BASTI DILHUSH TE P/S. LAKHIPUR DIST. CACHAR ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P K GOGOI, MR. A BURAGOHAIN,MR J P KACHARI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER 17.09
.2025 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Mr. P.K. Gogoi, learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is a
Page No.# 2/2 delay of 295 days in filing the appeal against conviction of the applicant under Sections 450 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Addl. P.P. submits that she has got no objection to the delay being condoned. Accordingly, the delay of 295 days is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same within a week.
The I.A. is accordingly allowed and disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant