HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4205 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the charge-sheet has also been submitted against the petitioners and as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned AGA for the State do not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage. November 18, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Kumar Verma, Rohit Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Mohd. Irsaad Alias Irshad And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench