ANUJ MISHRA @ ANUJ KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/10551/2025 · 2025-11-11
Abdul Moin, Babita Rani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188422 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188422 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10551 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the respondents no.1 to 3.
2. Notice to respondents no. 4 is dispensed with in view of order proposed to be passed.
3. Instant petition has been filed praying for quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 14.07.2025 bearing Case Crime No.0191 of 2025, under Section 115(2), 352, 351(3) B.N.S. and Section 3(1)(R), 3(1)(D) SC/ST Act, Police Station-Baldirai, District Sultanpur.
4. On the other hand, learned AGA on the basis of instructions sent by Sri Mukund Bharti, Sub-Inspector, Police Station Baldirai, Sultanpur dated 11.11.2025, states that a charge-sheet has been submitted before the Supervisory Authority on 05.10.2025.
5. Upon the same being pointed out learned counsel for the petitioners states that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Mishra, Mukul Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Anuj Mishra @ Anuj Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
pursue other remedy as may be available to them under law.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. November 11, 2025 Arti/- CRLP No. 10551 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench