JAY PRAKASH SINGH AND 16 OTHERS v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/15953/2025 · 2025-10-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188416 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188416 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15953 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard Sri Rishabh Kesarwani (A/R 0711/21) holding brief of Ms. Atipriya Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri S.K. Pal, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents.
2. The case of the writ petitioners is that they are computer operator in U.P. Police Department, however, they are not being accorded seniority calculating the training period including the 7th pay commission Rules along with the arrears as per the Government orders and the Rules in question.
3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider his claim.
4. Learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioner needs adjudication at the first instance by the fourth respondent.
5. To such a submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection and he gracefully accepts the same.
6. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed off granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self- attested copy of the writ petition before the fourth respondent, The Additional Director General of Police, Technical Services, DGP, Headquarters, Police Bhawan, U.P., Lucknow who shall on the receipt of the same by 07.11.2025, proceed to decide the claim of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Atipriya Gautam, Pratyush Srivastava, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Jay Prakash Singh And 16 Others .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
7. Needless to point out that the writ petition has been decided without seeking any response from the respondents. Thus, passing of this order may not be construed to an expression that this Court has gone into the merits of the case.
8. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. October 29, 2025 A. Prajapati WRIA No. 15953 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad