NANJUNDEGOWDA v. SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT
WP/7375/2024 · 2025-03-22
S Sunil Dutt Yadav
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18841 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18841 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12149 WP No. 7375 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 7375 OF 2024 (LB-RES) BETWEEN:
1. NANJUNDEGOWDA S/O LATE CHIKKAHYDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT K SHETTY HALLI VILLAGE, C A KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT …PETITIONER (BY SRI. APPAJI K R.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560001
2.
TALUK EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYAT, MADDUR, MANDYA DISTRICT
3. NANJUNDEGOWDA S/O AREBELLEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT K SHETTY HALLI VILLAGE, C A KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT Digitally signed by CHAITHRA P Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12149 WP No. 7375 of 2024
4.
PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER R/AT K SHETTY HALLI VILLAGE, C A KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA, AGA FOR R-1)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTATION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER AT ANNX-A PASSED BY THE R-2 IN G.P.
APPEAL NO. 39/2020 VIDE ORDER DD. 06.07.2023 ON THE FILE OF THE TALUK PANCHAYAT EXECUTIVE OFFICER, MADDUR MANDYA DISTRICT AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDER, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER No representation on behalf of the petitioner. Perused the order dated: 23.10.2024 passed by this court, which reads as herein under:
"The learned counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks to comply with the office objections. Failing which, the petition shall be listed for dismissal."
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12149 WP No. 7375 of 2024
2. As it is noticed that the office objections have not been complied with despite sufficient opportunity given, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40