HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4076 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Opposite party has filed compliance affidavit today in Court, which is taken on record. Office is directed to proceed accordingly. 2. Learned Standing Counsel representing the opposite party states that proceeding under Section 34/35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has been decided finally vide order dated 27.09.2025 passed by the authority concerned. Therefore, no cause of action survives to maintain the instant contempt application. 3. Accordingly, instant contempt application is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 29, 2025 Radhika Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Chandra Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Smt. Mansa Devi Alias Mansa Maurya .....Applicant(s) Rajesh Kumar Mishra, Naib Tahsildar, Tehsil Khalilabad .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad