Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188384 (ALL)

GEETA RANI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

/5316/2024 · 2025-11-24

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5316 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has made a statement at the bar that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and final report has been submitted in favour of the petitioner, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid fact. 3. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 24, 2025 Renu/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anupam Rastogi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Geeta Rani .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench