RAMESH ALIAS RAMESH BIND v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS
CRLP/17360/2025 · 2025-10-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188381 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188381 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17360 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed with following main reliefs:-
"1. Issue a writ of mandamus commanding respondent nos.2 to 3 to conduct the fair investigation and conclude the investigation of Case Crime no. 0034 of 2025, under section 103(1) of B.N.S P.S. Rampur Barkoniya, District Sonbhadra. II. Issue a writ of mandamus commanding respondent nos.1 to 2 to transfer the investigation of this case in Case Crime no. 0034 of 2025, under section 103(1) of B.N.S., P.S. Rampur Barkoniya, District Sonbhadra to any other competent investigation agency or any other police station of District Sonbhadra. III. Issue a writ of mandamus commanding respondent nos. 2 to 3 to produce the progress report before this Hon'ble court of Case Crime no. 0034 of 2025, under section 103(1) of B.N.S., P.S. Rampur Barkoniya, District Sonbhadra."
2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents submitted that in instant matter after completion of investigation charge sheet has been filed on 01.06.2025. In support of his contention, he has referred paragraph no.5 of the short counter affidavit. 3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in light of the statement given by the learned A.G.A. and paragraph no.5 of the short counter affidavit, with liberty to the petitioner to avail other remedy Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Harsh Srivastava, Manish Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ramesh Alias Ramesh Bind .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)
available to him under the law. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri R.K. Gupta, learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the material on record. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and averments made in short counter affidavit filed by learned AGA for the State, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication. 6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail such other remedy available to him under the law.
October 29, 2025 Atul CRLP No. 17360 of 2025 2 (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad