APHC010260862011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT BETWEEN: 1. SAMMETA JAGANMOHAN RAO, KRISHNA DIST & 3 OTHERS, S/O. PRAKASA RAO R/O. MUKKOLLU VILLAGE, GUDUR MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT 2. KATTA NAGA SREENIVASA RAO, S/O. LAKSHMAIAH R/O. LAKAMMA MANYAM VILLAGE, AVANIGADDA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. M. TATAYYA, S/O. SEHAGIRI R/O. TALAGADA DEEVI KOTHAPALEM VILLAGE, NAGAYALANKA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT 4. D. SURENERA BABU, S/O. YANAHI R/O. AVANIGADDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT 1. M D SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CO CHITTOOR DIST 6 OTHE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR 2. CHIEF ENGINEER ZONAL APSPDCL, CIRCLE OFFICE COMPOUND, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. SUPERINTENDING ELECTRICAL APSPDCL, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 1588/2011 SAMMETA JAGANMOHAN RAO, KRISHNA DIST & 3 OTHERS, S/O. PRAKASA RAO R/O. MUKKOLLU VILLAGE, GUDUR MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT KATTA NAGA SREENIVASA RAO, S/O. LAKSHMAIAH R/O. LAKAMMA MANYAM VILLAGE, AVANIGADDA NDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT M. TATAYYA, S/O. SEHAGIRI R/O. TALAGADA DEEVI KOTHAPALEM VILLAGE, NAGAYALANKA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT D. SURENERA BABU, S/O. YANAHI R/O. AVANIGADDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...Petitioner(s) AND M D SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CO CHITTOOR DIST 6 OTHE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR CHIEF ENGINEER ZONAL APSPDCL, CIRCLE OFFICE COMPOUND, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER OPERTAION ELECTRICAL APSPDCL, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3330] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO SAMMETA JAGANMOHAN RAO, KRISHNA DIST & 3 OTHERS, S/O. PRAKASA RAO R/O. MUKKOLLU KATTA NAGA SREENIVASA RAO, S/O. LAKSHMAIAH R/O. LAKAMMA MANYAM VILLAGE, AVANIGADDA M. TATAYYA, S/O. SEHAGIRI R/O. TALAGADA DEEVI KOTHAPALEM VILLAGE, NAGAYALANKA MANDAL, D. SURENERA BABU, S/O. YANAHI R/O. AVANIGADDA etitioner(s) M D SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CO CHITTOOR DIST 6 OTHE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT REP CHIEF ENGINEER ZONAL APSPDCL, CIRCLE OFFICE ENGINEER OPERTAION ELECTRICAL APSPDCL, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA 2 DISTRICT 4. DIVISIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER OPERTION APSPDCL, VUYYURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT 5. ASST DIVISIONAL ENGINEER APSPDCL, AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 6. ADDL ASST ENGINEER APSPDCL, NAGAYALANKA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 7. P ANANDA RAO, S/O. P. MADHUSUDHAN RAO R/O. JAYAPURAM VILLAGE, KODUR MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT 8. PODISETTI SUBRAHMANYAM, S/O. NAGESWARA RAO, R/O. BHAVADEVARAPALLI VILLAGE, NAGAYALANKA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 9. VAKA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. RAMU, R/O. BHAVADEVARAPALLI VILLAGE, NAGAYALANKA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 10. LOYA NAGA MALLESWARA RAO, S/O. GOVINDU, R/O. BHAVADEVARAPALLI VILLAGE, NAGAYALANKA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 11. PAMARTHI ANTHE SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. SIVARAMAIAH, R/O. BHAVADEVARAPALLI VILLAGE, NAGAYALANKA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. (RR 8 TO 11 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DT: 09.03.2012 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring the orders of the 4th Respondent in Lr. No.DE/O/VYR/TECH/ D.No. 117/11 dt. 20.1.2011 as illegal, arbitrary etc, and grant 3 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V V L N SARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K RAGHUVEER REDDY 2. 0 3. V R REDDY KOVVURI (SC FOR APCPDCL) 4. N SIVA REDDY(SC FOR APTRANSCO) The Court made the following: 4 ORDER: This Court has accommodated the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners to enable him to obtain instructions from the Writ Petitioners. Today learned counsel for the Writ Petitioners once again requested to grant two more weeks time to secure instructions from the Writ Petitioners. This Court found or see no reasons to grant such time. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 18.07.2025 Harin 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO 235 W.P.No. 1588 OF 2011 Date: 18-07-2025 Harin