SHYAM SINGH @ SHYAMU SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME, LUCKNOW
BAIL/14636/2023 · 2025-11-18
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188347 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188347 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14636 of 2023
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.129 of 2023, under Section 302 IPC, P.S. Pisawan, District Sitapur. 3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled by the informant alleging that second wife of her husband was taken by the uncle one Shyamu, his wife and son from home and was subsequently killed. 4. In the light of the said, submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that on the one hand the informant has stated that the deceased was held and subsequently killed, however, in the statement recorded subsequently she stated that she has not seen anyone killing the deceased. However, she subsequently stated that she had seen. It is further argued that the applicant is in custody since 06.05.2023 and has no criminal antecedents. Postmortem report on record indicates the cause of death as antemortem injuries being five in number which include incised wound and abrasions. Recovery was also affected from the applicant. 5. Trial Court report on record indicates that charge was framed against the applicant on 04.10.2023 and PW 1 was examined and cross-examined on various dates and PW 2's statement was recorded on 25.07.2025, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kushendra Kumar Singh Rathour, Farooq Ayoob, Mohd. Shahid Akhtar, Pankaj Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Pankaj Kumar Shyam Singh @ Shyamu Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow .....Opposite Party(s)
however, the other eyewitnesses have not been examined. 6. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 7. Considering the trial Court report which indicates that only two witnesses have been examined and the applicant has no criminal antecedent, there is no likelihood of the trial being concluded in the near future; there is also nothing on record to suggest that the applicant, if enlarged on bail, can adversely affect the trial. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 8.
Let the applicant Shyam Singh @ Shyamu Singh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 18, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 14636 of 2023 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench