[2025:RJ-JP:22842] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2880/2025 Yogendra Khandelwal S/o Shri Maatadeen, Aged About 63 Years, R/o B-22, Shiv Marg, Banipark, Amer Jaipur ----Accused/Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ---Respondent 2. Mahesh Kumar Yadav, S/o Suva Lal Yadav, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Girdharipura Mahla Bagru, Jaipur ----Complainant/Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Maharshi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, P.P. with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, P.P. Mr. Ashvin Garg Mr. Prabhuram, SI, PS, Daulatpura Jaipur (West) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 30/05/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is an ongoing dispute inter-se the petitioner and the complainant. It is further submitted that impugned FIR is lodged for causing destruction qua the boundary wall of the complainant which has injured the guard as well. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that FIR is lodged alleging offences registered under the head of bailable offenses. It is further submitted that persons who were arrested at the site, are enlarged on bail. In compliance of the directions passed in the erstwhile order, investigating Officer has marked appearance and has submitted [2025:RJ-JP:22842] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2880/2025] that the petitioner on account of ill health is not joining the investigation. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and upon perusal of the material available on record, this Court has noted that there are disputed questions facts involved in the instant matter, veracity of which can be confirmed via investigation only. Taking note of the above stated, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation, within a period of seven days. Howsoever, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner till the conclusion of the investigation. It is clarified that, investigation authority is at liberty to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, after conclusion of the investigation. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J GAURAV/531