Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188287 (ALL)

NASEEM AHMAD v. State of UP AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/12764/2024 · 2025-02-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:21587 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12764 of 2024 Petitioner :- Naseem Ahmad Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Prakash Yadav,Sanjay Kr. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel for respondents. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to permit the petitioner for retaining the government quarter as Quarter No.74 Type-First situated at Reserve Police Line Campus, Commissionerate, Prayagraj and the respondents particularly the respondent No.4 may also be directed to consider the petitioner's representation and to take an appropriate decision in accordance with law within some stipulated time as per fixed by this Hon'ble court. b). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to make payment of salary to petitioner month to month regularly as and when it falls due in accordance with law including its arrears within some stipulated period to be specified by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for redressal of his grievance, petitioner has filed representation before respondent No.4-Assistant Commissioner of Police, Commissionerate, Prayagraj, but till date no decision has been taken. Lastly, it is submitted that a direction may be issued to respondent No.4 to decide the aforesaid representation within a stipulated time, for which learned counsels for respondents have no objection. 4. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.4- Assistant Commissioner of Police, Commissionerate, Prayagraj to decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law maximum within period of one month from the date of submission of certified copy of this order. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No.4 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. Order Date :- 14.2.2025 Amit Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad