1 2025:CGHC:3696 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 930 of 2018 Sanju Nirmalkar S/o Mehataru Nirmalkar Aged About 40 Years R/o- Village Mandir Hasaud, Bazar Chowk, P.S. Mandir Hasaud, Tahsil And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1.Smt. Jageshwari Nirmalkar And Others W/o Shri Sanju Nirmalkar Aged About 29 Years R/o- Village Post Sirri, Tahsil Gunderdehi, P.S. Chowki Machandur, P.S. Utai, Tahsil And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2.Smt. Sohadra Nirmalkar W/o Mehataru Nirmalkar Aged About 55 Years R/o- Village Mandir Hasaud, Bazar Chowk, P.S. Mandir Hasaud, Tahsil And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3.Santosh Nirmalkar S/o Shri Mehataru Nirmalkar Aged About 42 Years R/o- Village Mandir Hasaud, Bazar Chowk, P.S. Mandir Hasaud, Tahsil And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4.Kalyani Nirmalkar W/o Santosh Nirmalkar Aged About 40 Years R/o- Village Mandir Hasaud, Bazar Chowk, P.S. Mandir Hasaud, Tahsil And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5.Nirmala Nirmalkar D/o Mehataru Nirmalkar Aged About 45 Years R/o- Village Mandir Hasaud, Bazar Chowk, P.S. Mandir Hasaud, Tahsil And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 ---- Respondent(s) ______________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. V.B. Soni, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Vikas Upadhyaya, Advocate. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 21/01/2025 1. Heard Mr. V.B. Soni, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Vikas Upadhayaya, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following prayer:- “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside/quash the impugned order dated 06.04.2018 (Annexure P-1) and also the order dated 22.04.2017 (Annexure P-2) in the interest of Justice.” 3. Mr. V.B. Soni, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client is not responding hence, he has no instructions. 4. From above, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter due to efflux of time. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed on this ground alone. 6. A copy of the order be sent to the concerned trial Court for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal