Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18827 (RAJ)

M/S RAJTECH AUTOMOTIVES PVT LTD. v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/7144/2021 · 2025-07-28

Avneesh Jhingan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:28416] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7144/2021 M/s Rajtech Automotives Pvt Ltd., Plot No. 3, Amrapali Circle, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur-302021, Through Its Director And Authorised Signatory ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Department Of Industries, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur - 302005 Through The Commissioner Of Industries. 2. Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited, Head Office- Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur - 302 005 Through Managing Director. 3. Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited, Unit II, Rest House Road, Riico Chowk, Bhiwadi, Distt. Alwar- 301019 Through Senior Regional Manager. 4. Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited, Head Office- Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur - 302005 Through Secretary. 5. Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited, Unit II, Rest House Road, Riico Chowk, Bhiwadi, Distt. Alwar - 301019 Through Deputy General Manager. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Prateek Kasliwal For Respondent(s) : Mr.Virendra Lodha, Sr. Adv. With Mr.Ankit Rathore HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Order 28/07/2025 1. This petition is filed aggrieved of cancellation of the plot allotted to the petitioner by RIICO and the cancellation was upheld upto the second appeal. [2025:RJ-JP:28416] (2 of 2) [CW-7144/2021] 2. The short controversy involved in the present petition is that the impugned order dated 21.01.2021 (Annexure-38) passed by the second appellate authority is non-speaking. 3. It is trite law that a quasi judicial officer has to not only record reasons but also communicate it to the affected party and it also facilitates in judicial scrutiny of the order. 4. From perusal of the order, it is forthcoming that it is bereft of reasons. 5. Consequently, the order dated 21.01.2021 is set aside. The matter is remitted to the second appellate authority. Further the second appellate authority shall make an endeavor to decide the matter afresh as expeditiously as possible in the facts of the case. 6. The writ petition is allowed. 7. In order to avoid further delay, let the petitioner through its representative appear before the concerned respondent on 25.08.2025 at 11:00 A.M.. (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Monika/98