HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15900 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Siddharth Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Jitendra Singh learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel. 2. Claim of the petitioner for arrears of salary and the objection of respondents based on principle of 'no work no pay', cannot be considered in writ jurisdiction being disputed facts. However, disposal of this writ petition will not come in the way if petitioner files a detail representation before concerned respondent stating all facts along with relevant documents, then the concerned respondent will look into the grievance of the petitioner and will pass a reasoned order expeditiously. 3. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. October 29, 2025 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Siddharth Khare Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Pintu Kumar Pal .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad