JAN MOHAMMAD ALI ALIAS RAJU ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Bail Appln./2956/2025 · 2025-09-15
Pranjal Das
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18821 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18821 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010199892025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2956/2025 JAN MOHAMMAD ALI ALIAS RAJU ALI S/O JAMIR ALI R/O DAMPUR 4 NO. SOBANGSHA P.S. HAJO DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY, MR. SAYED SALIM AHMED,MS R DEKA,MR. I U CHOWDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 16.09.2025
1. Heard Mr. H. R. A. Choudhury, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. I. U. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
2. This petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioner, namely, Jan Mohammad Ali @ Raju Ali, is stated to be in custody since 13.05.2025 praying for grant of bail in connection with PRC Case
Page No.# 2/2 No. 3096/2025 arising out of Gorchuk P.S. Case No.150/2025 which after completion of investigation resulted in a charge sheet against him on 06.08.2025 under Sections 103(1)/115(2) of the BNS Act.
3. Charge sheet has been lodged only against the present accused under the aforesaid Sections wherein 24 witnesses have been listed and the case is stated to be at the stage of appearance before the learned court below. Though scanned copy of TCR was called for but not yet received.
4. Mr. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor objects to granting bail at this stage considering that the case is one of the alleged homicide.
5. However, considering the completion of investigation and the length of detention, I am of the considered view that subject to suitable conditions, the accused can be released on bail, at this stage.
6. Accordingly, it is directed that the accused petitioner named above, shall be released on bail of Rs.30,000/- with one suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of learned concerned court subject to the following conditions that the petitioners: (a) shall not abscond. (b) Shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence (c) shall not intimate or harass the informant/family member or any of the witnesses.
7. Violation of any of the conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.
8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed and disposed of.
9. Return the case diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant