IN T 216 Hardev Ka Vishesh Sa Mohali and CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU order dated Court in CWP Developmen allowed and respondent as per her en order dated respondents counsel for 13.10.2025 COCP-2772-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.2772 of Date of decision : ev Kaur Versus sh Sarangal, The Chief Administrat li and another AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Ashok Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aditya Narayan Arya Garg, Mr. Rahul Sharma-I, Advocate for the respondents. I GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition has be dated 25.2.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed in CWP-25158-2021 titled as “Hardev K pment Authority and another”, whe ed and the impugned Annexure P-16 wa ndent concerned was directed to allot the her entitlement. Learned counsel for the petition dated 25.2.2025 (Annexure P-1) has no ndents till date. In compliance of the last ord el for the respondents has already filed .2025 of Shri Ravinder singh, Estate Of 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 772 of 2025 (O & M) sion :-09.03.2026 …..Petitioner nistrator, GMADA, SAS Nagar, …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA ocate Garg, Advocate for ocate has been filed alleging violation of passed by a Division Bench of this rdev Kaur vs. Greater Mohali Area , whereby the writ petition was 16 was quashed and set aside. The lot the subject plot to the petitioner, etitioner submits that the aforesaid has not been complied with by the st order dated 29.9.2025, learned y filed Compliance Affidavit dated tate Officer (Plots), GMADA, SAS VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.11 11.13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Nagar, in th taken on re petitioner. of Intent dat measuring 3 Mohali), SA payment m original term submits tha complied w been issued be disposed learned cou of. Needle respondents petitioner by March 09, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep COCP-2772-2025 (O & M) r, in the Registry, which has been annex on record. Copy thereof is supplied oner. Learned counsel for the respond ent dated 29.09.2025 (Annexure R-1) and uring 300 square yards in Category ‘B’ a li), SAS Nagar has been allotted to t ent made by the petitioner as per the al terms and conditions and as reiterated In view of the above, learned its that since the order of the Writ Cou lied with and Letter of Intent dated 29 issued in favour of the petitioner, the p posed of. Heard. In view of the facts noted abov d counsel for the petitioner, the present eedless to say, once the petitioner mak ndents-GMADA, the Letter of Allotm oner by the respondents. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, sh , 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 2 annexed on the file. The same is pplied to learned counsel for the spondents has referred to the Letter 1) and submits that the subject plot y ‘B’ at 750 Plots Scheme (IT City, d to the petitioner subject to the er the schedule contained in the erated in the Letter of Intent. learned counsel for the petitioner it Court dated 25.2.2025 has been ted 29.9.2025 (Annexure R-1) has the present contempt petition may above and the statement made by esent contempt petition is disposed er makes the entire payment to the Allotment shall be issued to the any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.11 11.13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document