1 2025:CGHC:28619 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 585 of 2019 Khushi Mangalani @ Preet Mangalani W/o Shri Vikram @ Vicky Mangalani, Aged About 27 Years R/o Sundarganj, Athwani Gali, Teuram Nagar, Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus Vikram @ Vicky Mangalani Shri Amarlal Mangalani, Aged About 28 Years R/o State Bank Colony, Gurunanak Ward, Bhandara, Maharashtra., District : Bhandara, Maharashtra ... Non-applicant(s) For Applicant : Ms. Ruchinagar, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Adil Minhaj, Advocate. For Non-applicant : Mr. Palash Sajani, Advocate. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 27.06.2025 1. Heard Ms. Ruchinagar, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. Palash Sajani, learned counsel appearing for the non- applicant. 2. The present revision petition has been filed by the applicant with the following prayers: “1) It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for entire record of Misc. Judicial Case No. 37/2018 (Khushi Mangalani @ Preet Mangalani Versus Vikram @ Vicky Mangalani), from the KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 Family Court, Dhamtari. ii) It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside/quash the order dated order dated 06.03.2019 (ANNEXURE A-1), passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Dhamtari (CG) in Misc. Judicial Case No. 37/2018 (Khushi Mangalani @ Preet Mangalani Versus Vikram @ Vicky Mangalani), iii) It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant maintenance to the applicant @ Rs. 25000/- per month from the date of filing application, iv) It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to any other relief(s) which this Hon'ble Court may think fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. Learned counsel for the applicant/revisionist as well as private respondent submit that in the present case, a mutual divorce has taken place between the parties and permanent alimony has already been paid by the non-applicant. Hence, the present matter become infructuous. 4. In view of the submissions made by the parties, the present criminal revision is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal