923-CA-4935-2023.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 923 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4935 OF 2023 IN FAST/15718/2020 Laxman Shesherao Shelke ….Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Thr Dist. Collector Nanded And Ors. …..Respondents ….. Mr. Tushar Nagarkar h/f Mr. Nagarkar Kiran M., Advocate for Applicant Mr. D. J. Patil, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 Ms. Vaishali S. Swami h/f Mr. Mahesh C. Swami, Advocate for Respondent No.3 ….. CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. DATE : 09.04.2025 PER COURT : 1. This is an Application fled by the Original Claimant for condonation of 207 days delay caused in preferring the First Appeal. 2. The learned Advocate for the Applicant – Claimant submits that, suffcient reasons are shown in the Application for not preferring the Appeal within the prescribed time. Hence, the Application be allowed. 3. The Application is opposed by the learned AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 and the learned Advocate Ms. Vaishali for Respondent No.3. They submit that, no suffcient reasons are shown in the Application. They further submit that, Application be rejected. 1 2025:BHC-AUG:10838 923-CA-4935-2023.odt 4. After hearing both the sides and for the reasons mentioned in Paragraph Nos.6, 7 and 8 of the Application, the Application is allowed in terms of Prayer Clause - ‘B’. The Applicant / Appellant shall not be entitled for the statutory benefts and the interest for the aforesaid delayed period. Appeal be registered. The copy of this order be kept in the order sheet of the Appeal Memo. 5. Civil Application stands disposed off accordingly. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] Sameer/April-2025 2 Signed by: Md. Sameer Q. Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 15/04/2025 14:38:04