CHINNAMASTA PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/6040/2025 · 2025-03-05
S Sunil Dutt Yadav
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18816 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18816 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9473 WP No. 6040 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 6040 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN:
CHINNAMASTA PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY REGD. UNDER COMPANIES ACT 1956.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 7, CHITTRANAJAN AVENUE, KOLKATA - 700 072.
CORPORATE OFFICE AT 4TH FLOOR, SALARPURIA WINDSOR, ULSOOR ROAD, BANGALORE, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE/ LEGAL HEAD ASHWIN SANCHETI, S/O LATE MANOHAR CHAND SANCHETI. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. ANUPARNA BORDOLOI, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, DR. AMBEDKHAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY.
2.
MANDYA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANNUR ROAD, NEXT TO PUMP HOUSE, MANDYA - 571 401, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9473 WP No. 6040 of 2025
3.
SATHANURU VILLAGE PANCHAYAT SATHANAUR VILLAGE, HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 401, REPRESENTED BY ITS PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER / SECRETARY.
4.
UMMADAHALLI VILLAGE PANCHAYAT UMMADAHALLI VILLAGE, HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 401, REPRESENTED BY ITS PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER/SECRETARY.
5.
DIRECTORATE OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING PB NO. 5257, MULTI-STOREYED BUILDING GATE-4, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER/DIRECTOR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOPANNA BELIYAPPA, AGA FOR R1 AND R5 SRI. M.S. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4;
SRI. T.P. VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER BEARING NO MO.MA.PRA/NA. YO VI/ VI.NA/SATHANURU/14/2019-2020/763 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 TO THE PETITIONER ON 29.11.2024, AS THE SAME IS HIGHLY ARBITRARY, AND WITHOUT THE AUTHORITY OF LAW (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9473 WP No. 6040 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER
1. Memo for withdrawal has been filed, which reads as follows:
"The undersigned craves the leave of this Hon'ble Court to submit during the pendency of the aforesaid writ petition had submitted a requisition before the Respondent No.2 on 01.03.2025 seeking the Respondent No.2 to extend an opportunity of hearing and to withdraw the impugned
order dated
29.11.2024. Hence, owing to the subsequent developments in the subject matter, the undersigned herewith craves the leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the aforesaid writ petition, with a liberty to file a fresh and comprehensive writ petition. WHEREFORE, it is humbly prayed that this memo of withdrawal may be taken on record and the subject writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition in the interest of Justice."
2. In light of the same, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. All contentions are kept open.
- 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9473 WP No. 6040 of 2025
4. Liberty as sought for by the petitioner is reserved.
5. Petitioner to serve copies of writ petition on the respondents forthwith. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39 CT: BHK