MAHENDRA KUMAR GUPTA v. CHHATTISGARH STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION
WPC/2041/2025 · 2025-04-25
Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18814 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18814 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:18803
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2041 of 2025 1 - Mahendra Kumar Gupta S/o Late Ramchandra Prasad Aged About 73 Years R/o Ward No.06 Nagar Panchayat Pratappur Polic Station Road Pratappur District - Surajpur (C.G.).
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Information Commission Through Chhattisgarh State Information Commissioner Office At Sector - 19, North Block Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar District - Raipur (C.G.). 2 - First Appellante Officer / Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Pratappur District - Surajpur (C.G.). 3 - Public Information Officer / Secretary Gram Panchayat Rampur Janpad Panchayat Pratappur District - Surajpur (C.G.).
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Vishwakarma, Advocate. Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT
2 For Respondent(s) No. 1 : Mr. Shayam Sunder Lal Tekchandani, Advocate.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board 25/04/2025
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-
“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 for early disposal of the Second Appeal filed by the petitioner as early as possible within period of 30 days. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court kindly further be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to provide the true copy of documents as demanded by the petitioner in his application filed under Right to Information Act (mentioned in Annexure P-1). 10.3 Any appropriate writ, direction or order may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is seeking direction to respondent No. 1 for early disposal of the Second Appeal filed by the petitioner way back on 01.05.2024 as
3 such this petition has been filed.
3. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 submits that in view of limited prayed made by learned counsel for petitioner, he is having no objection.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also
consideration the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 1 to decide the Second Appeal filed by the petitioner way back on 01.05.2024 with a period of 3 months from the production of this order.
6. With this observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat