HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 4384 of 2025 Court No. - 86 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned counsel for the respondent as well as learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2.This Criminal appeal under Section 14-A (1) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, (in short of 'the SC/ST Act) has been preferred by the appellants with the prayer to quash the impugned summoning order dated 20.8.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, (SC/ST Act), Agra as well as entire proceeding of Complaint Case no. 18 of 2022 ( Sanjay Vs. Annu & others), under Section 323, 452, 354, 504, 506 IPC and 3 (2) 5a of SC/ST Act, P.S. Jagdishpura, District Agra. 3.The contention of the learned counsel for the appellants is that no offence against the appellants is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. 4.From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the appellants. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.IR. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P. Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192, and Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Pankaj Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Suvash Ram Anil Kumar Alias Annu And 4 Others .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) (Cr.) 283. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage. Moreover, the applicant has got a right of discharge before the court below and he is free to take all the submissions in the said discharge application before the trial court. 5.The prayer for quashing the impugned order as well as entire proceeding of the aforementioned case is refused. 6. However, it is provided that if the appellants appearand surrender before the court below and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. 7.With the aforesaid observations this Criminal appeal is finally disposed off. October 29, 2025 A. CRLA No. 4384 of 2025 2 (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad