MAHENDRA KUMAR GUPTA v. CHHATTISGARH STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION
WPC/2053/2025 · 2025-04-25
Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18812 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18812 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:18805
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2053 of 2025 1 - Mahendra Kumar Gupta S/o Late Ramchandra Prasad Aged About 73 Years Resident Of Ward No. 06, Nagar Panchayat Pratappur, Police Station Road Pratappur, District Surajpur (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Information Commission Through- Chhattisgarh State Information Commissioner, Office At Sectror-19, North Block, Nawa
Raipur,
Atal
Nagar,
District
Raipur
(C.G.) 2 - First Appellate Officer / Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Pratappur,
District
Surajpur
(C.G.) 3 - Public Information Officer/secretary Gram Panchayat Baikona, Janpad Panchayat Pratappur, District Surajpur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Vishwakarma, Advocate. For Respondent(s) No. 1 : Mr. Shyam Sunder Lal Tekchandani, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 25/04/2025
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR Date: 2025.04.28 14:59:44 +0530
2 reliefs:-
“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 for early disposal of the Second Appeal filed by the petitioner as early as possible within period of 30 days. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court kindly further be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to provide the true copy of documents as demanded by the petitioner in his application filed under Right to Information Act (mentioned in Annexure P-1). 10.3 Any appropriate writ, direction or order may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is seeking direction to respondent No. 1 for early disposal of the Second Appeal filed by the petitioner way back on 01.05.2024, as such, this petition has been filed. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in view of limited prayed made by learned counsel for petitioner, he is having no objection. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the
3 petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 1 to decide the Second Appeal filed by the petitioner way back on 01.05.2024 with a period of 3 months from the date of production of this order. 6.
With this observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakhay