HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38492 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. List has been revised. None appears for the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that impugned report is not a final order and it has to be acted upon by due process, therefore, the petitioner has still liberty to raise all legally permissible objections as and when it is acted upon. 3. In above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of that in case inquiry report is acted upon in a due process, the petitioner may be heard, if there is no legal impediment. March 19, 2026 A.N. Mishra Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Shahzad Ahmad Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMARNATH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad