Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188079 (ALL)

BABLOO AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/24492/2025 · 2025-10-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 24492 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA appearing for the State. 2. This present application has been filed for seeking quashing of charge sheet dated 17.6.2021 and cognizance/summoning order dated 19.10.2022 as well as entire criminal proceeding of Case no. 348 of 2022 (State vs. Babloo and others) arising out of Case Crime no. 08 of 2021 under sections 323, 504, 506, 427, 342 IPC, PS- Chandaus, District Aligarh. 3. On perusal of the entire material available on record in shape of impugned order along with other record, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order along with entire criminal proceedings of the said case, can be set aside. 4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants has submitted that since applicant nos. 1 and 2 have already been bailed out, liberty may be granted to applicant no. 3 to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicant no. 3 namely Faizal Khan surrender before the court concerned within a period of 15 days Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Babloo And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) from today and apply for bail, if there is no other legal impediment before learned court concerned, his bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825). 7. However, it is made clear that all the applicants are at liberty to avail all other remedy available at law. October 29, 2025 Shaswat NA528 No. 24492 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad