Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11229-DB CCC No. 316 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 316 OF 2022 BETWEEN:
SRI. U VIJAYA SHANKAR SHENOY S/O U NARASIMHA SHENOY AGED 60 YEARS R/A NO. 218, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND E CROSS 8TH MAIN, 3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE BASAVESWARANAGAR, BANGALORE-79. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. AMARESH N - ADVOCATE) AND:
SRI NANDKISHORE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA LOCAL HEAD QUARTERS NO.65, ST. MARKS ROAD BANGALORE-560001. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. K KASTURI – SR. COUNSEL FOR SMT. SUBHA ANANTHI K - ADVOCATE)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED AND PUNISH HIM FOR
Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11229-DB CCC No. 316 of 2022
DELIBERATE DISOBEDIENCE OF THIS HON’BLE COURT ORDER DATED 07.02.2012 IN W.P.NO.22242/2011(S) VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
THIS CCC, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR)
This contempt proceeding is initiated by the complainant against the respondent/accused for disobedience of the order passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.No.22242/2011 dated 07.02.2012 vide Annexure-A.
2.
Learned counsel Sri Amaresh N for the complainant is present before the Court.
3. Learned Senior Counsel Sri K.Kasturi for the respondent/accused is appearing through video conferencing and represents Smt.Subha Ananti K who is on record. He submits that there is no consequence for
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11229-DB CCC No. 316 of 2022
consideration of the grounds urged in this contempt proceedings and to take action against the respondent.
4. However, keeping in view the submission made by learned counsel for the parties and so also, keeping in view Section 2(b) as well as Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act inclusive of Article 215 of Constitution of India, this contempt proceeding does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the contempt proceeding is hereby dropped.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
Sd/- (K.SOMASHEKAR) JUDGE
Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE
DKB