Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188058 (ALL)

SRI BALDESHIK SOPAN TRUST THRU. MANAGING TRUSTEE/PRESIDENT,GOVIND KUMAR LOHIA AND 9 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. INSTITUTIONAL FINANCE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/12025/2025 · 2025-12-16

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12025 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Sharad Pathak, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Pawan Kumar Pandey and Ms. Priya Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Pankaj Srivastava, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State- opposite parties no.1 and 2, Sri H.G.S. Parihar, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Amit Singh, the learned counsel for the opposite parties no.3 and 4 and perused the records. 2. By means of the instant petition the petitioners have challenged the validity of an order dated 31.10.2025, passed by the opposite party no.2/Deputy Registrar, Firms, Societies & Chits Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, whereby the earlier office order dated 17.10.2025 was declared to be ineffective till further orders and 18.11.2025 was fixed for hearing. 3. Although, elaborated submissions have been advanced by the learned counsel for parties, when Sri H.G.S. Parihar, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties no.3 and 4 has conceded that he will have no objection in case the impugned order dated 31.10.2025 is modified to the extent that the part of the order which provides that earlier office order dated 17.10.2025 will be ineffective, be set aside and the matter be left open to be Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Priya Singh, Pawan Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Amit Singh Sri Baldeshik Sopan Trust Thru. Managing Trustee/President,Govind Kumar Lohia And 9 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Institutional Finance Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) decided by the Deputy Registrar after taking into consideration all the pleas raised by the parties. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the aforesaid proposal. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of by modifying the impugned order dated 31.10.2025, passed by the Deputy Registrar, Firms, Societies & Chits Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to the effect that the earlier office order dated 17.10.2025 passed by the Deputy Registrar shall remain operative till a fresh decision is taken by the Deputy Registrar after giving the parties concerned an opportunity of hearing and after taking into consideration all the pleas raised by the parties expeditiously in accordance with law preferably within a period of three weeks from today. 6. It is clarified that this court has not entered into the merits and demerits of the rival claims of parties which is left open to be decided by the opposite party no.2 in accordance with law. None of the parties shall take any action detrimental to the interests of the trust and only day to day affairs will be managed. December 16, 2025 Ram. WRIC No. 12025 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench