Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188035 (ALL)

AMAN @ AMAN RAWAT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS

A482/9736/2025 · 2025-11-18

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9736 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. Short counter affidavit along with power filed by Shri Mohd. Kaif Khan, Advocate on behalf of opposite party nos.2 to 4 is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the record. The present application has been filed seeking following main relief:- "to quash the proceeding of Case which has been initiated by FIR lodged by informant of case at P.S. PG.I. as Case Crime No. 0179 of 2024, U/S- 323, 324, 307, 504 IPC, P.S.- P.G.I. District- Lucknow, developed from the charge sheet filed by: police of P.S. P.G.I., Lucknow, the charge sheet no. 01 of 2024 dated 09.07.2024, the trial is pending before the court of learned Additional District and Session Judge, Room No.17, Lucknow as State Versus Aman Rawat, till the disposal of this petition." Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and a compromise has been arrived between them dated 29.10.2025 (Original copy of the same is appended as annexure No.3 to the application). Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below, before which, the case is pending. Therefore, the compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ihtisham, Mohd. Taiyab Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Aman @ Aman Rawat .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) parties concerned before the Court below itself. Counsel for opposite party nos. 2 to 4 has no objection, in case compromise takes place. Both the parties are directed to appear before the concerned court below on 25.11.2025 and pursue their compromise application. The court below is directed to pass an order on the said compromise application and all formalities will be completed within eight weeks from that date. Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it or has been already filed, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. Registry is directed to return the original copy of the compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicant after taking photocopy of the same. November 18, 2025 Mohit Singh/- A482 No. 9736 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench